Attitudes Toward Muslims and Institutional Moral Learning in Higher Education

Principal Investigator & Author: Kevin M. Waldman

 

Abstract

Background

The events following October 7, 2023 profoundly altered public discourse surrounding Muslims, Israel, identity, and social justice on university campuses throughout the United States. As a student at the University of Michigan during this period, I observed emotionally charged classroom discussions, public demonstrations, and university messaging that appeared to shape how students understood Muslims and Muslim experiences. These observations prompted a broader empirical question: How do university students develop attitudes toward Muslims, and what role do emotional learning and educational experiences play in shaping those attitudes?

Methods

This study employed a mixed-methods design consisting of quantitative survey items and qualitative open-ended responses from undergraduate students enrolled at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor campus. The study examined students' reported sources of knowledge regarding Muslims and Muslim experiences, including professor-led instruction, classroom discussions, university messaging, direct interpersonal relationships, and lived experience. Qualitative responses were analyzed using thematic analysis.⁵

Results

The findings indicated that 72% of participants reported acquiring their understanding of Muslim experiences primarily after entering college. Additionally, 68% reported that educational experiences, including classroom discussions, professor instruction, and university messaging, exerted a greater influence on their understanding of Muslims than direct interpersonal relationships or lived experience. Qualitative findings revealed four central themes: (1) emotional learning through educational experiences, (2) professor influence and moral framing, (3) institutional narratives and campus messaging, and (4) limited direct experience with Muslims.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that emotionally salient educational experiences may play a substantial role in shaping social attitudes during emerging adulthood. Beyond attitudes toward Muslims specifically, this study raises broader questions concerning the relationship between emotional learning, knowledge acquisition, and what this study proposes as institutional moral learning within higher education. Understanding the psychological consequences when emotional identification precedes independent understanding may represent an important challenge for future research in psychology and higher education.

Keywords: Emotional learning; Muslims; Higher education; Emerging adulthood; Empathy; Institutional moral learning; Attitude formation.

Introduction

Emerging adulthood is a developmental period characterized by identity exploration, emotional sensitivity, and the formation of enduring social, moral, and political attitudes.¹ Universities therefore occupy a uniquely influential role during this stage of life, serving not only as institutions of knowledge acquisition but also as environments in which students encounter new social experiences, emotional narratives, and moral frameworks that may shape how they understand themselves and others.

Questions concerning how attitudes toward social groups develop have long occupied scholars across psychology and the social sciences. Historically, attitudes have been understood as emerging through social learning, interpersonal experiences, and broader cultural influences.³ At the same time, emotions play a central role in moral judgment and social evaluation, influencing how individuals interpret issues of fairness, empathy, and social responsibility.²

The events following October 7, 2023 brought these questions into particularly sharp focus. As a student at the University of Michigan during this period, I observed intense classroom discussions, public demonstrations, and emotionally charged conversations concerning Muslims, Israel, discrimination, and social justice. In many cases, these discussions extended beyond factual or historical instruction and appeared to involve emotionally meaningful narratives regarding fairness, identity, oppression, and moral responsibility. These observations prompted a broader empirical question: How do university students develop attitudes toward Muslims and Muslim experiences, and what role do educational experiences play in shaping those attitudes?

This question may be particularly relevant within higher education, where students increasingly encounter discussions concerning social identity, discrimination, and moral responsibility through coursework, classroom dialogue, university programming, and peer interactions. Educational environments increasingly emphasize emotional learning, empathy, and social-emotional development as important dimensions of higher education.⁴ While these experiences may foster empathy and social understanding, less is known about the relative influence of educational experiences, emotional learning, and direct interpersonal experience in shaping attitudes toward social groups.

This study, therefore, examined how undergraduate students at the University of Michigan Ann Arbor campus developed attitudes toward Muslims and Muslim experiences, with particular attention to the role of professor-led instruction, classroom discussions, university messaging, emotional learning, and direct interpersonal experience. The primary objective of this study was descriptive: to examine where students reported acquiring their understanding of Muslims and how they described the experiences that shaped those attitudes.

Beyond attitudes toward Muslims specifically, this study also considers a broader question concerning the role of higher education in shaping social and moral understanding during emerging adulthood. As universities increasingly emphasize emotional learning, empathy, and social responsibility, understanding how these experiences influence attitude formation may provide insight into the evolving relationship between knowledge acquisition, emotional development, and psychological well-being.

The findings of this study ultimately raise a broader psychological question: What are the consequences when emotional identification precedes independent understanding? While this study does not attempt to answer that question directly, it offers an empirical foundation from which that larger discussion may begin.

Methods

Participants

Participants were 712 undergraduate students recruited from the Ann Arbor campus of the University of Michigan between January and May 2024. All participants were at least 18 years of age and currently enrolled as undergraduate students at the time of participation. The sample included students from a range of academic majors and class years. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. No course credit, financial compensation, or other incentives were provided. Eligibility criteria required participants to be enrolled full-time and capable of providing informed consent.

Procedure

Data were collected using an anonymous, in-person survey administration across the Ann Arbor campus of the University of Michigan. Participants were recruited in public academic settings, including student centers, outdoor study areas, and other commonly used student spaces. Recruitment followed standardized, noncoercive procedures, and participation was entirely voluntary. Before participation, all students were informed of the purpose of the study and advised that they could decline participation or discontinue participation at any point without penalty. No identifying information, including names, email addresses, device identifiers, or IP addresses, was collected. The survey required approximately 8 to 10 minutes to complete and was administered under conditions designed to maximize privacy and reduce social desirability influences. Participants completed the questionnaire independently and without discussion with other participants.

Design

This study employed a cross-sectional mixed-methods design integrating quantitative survey data with qualitative open-ended responses. The primary objective was descriptive: to examine how undergraduate students describe their attitudes toward Muslims, the sources from which those attitudes were acquired, and the role of emotional learning in shaping perceptions of fairness and cultural understanding.

A paired-balance survey design was used throughout the instrument. Concepts were assessed through both positively and negatively framed statements to reduce acquiescence bias and allow participants to express ambivalence or complexity in their views. Survey items were written using neutral language and avoided morally evaluative wording whenever possible.

Measures

All primary variables were measured using 5-point Likert-type response scales ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores reflected greater endorsement of the item. For descriptive reporting, responses of 4 (agree) and 5 (strongly agree) were categorized as endorsement. Reported percentages reflect the proportion of participants endorsing each item using this threshold.

Learning Source

Learning source items examined where participants believed their understanding of Muslims and Muslim experiences was primarily acquired, including family influences, pre-college experiences, coursework, peer interaction, media exposure, and campus dialogue.

Emotional Learning

Emotional learning was assessed through items examining the emotional intensity of learning experiences and the extent to which narratives, personal stories, and classroom discussions influenced attitudes toward Muslims.

Perceptions of Fairness

Perceptions of fairness were assessed through items examining beliefs regarding discrimination, social treatment, and fairness toward Muslims within the United States.

Cultural Compatibility

articipants were asked to indicate their perceptions regarding the relationship between Islamic culture and Western society, including perceptions of compatibility, tension, and coexistence.

Open-Ended Responses

Participants completed open-ended prompts describing experiences that most influenced their understanding of Muslims and the emotions associated with those experiences.

Qualitative Component

Open-ended responses were analyzed using thematic analysis.⁵ Responses were reviewed iteratively to identify recurring patterns regarding emotional learning, classroom experiences, peer influence, and perceptions of fairness. Themes were retained based on recurrence, conceptual coherence, and relevance to the objectives of this study.

Representative quotations were de-identified prior to analysis and reporting.

Analytic Strategy

Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods. Frequency distributions and percentage endorsement rates were calculated for all primary variables.

Given the descriptive aims of this study, analyses focused on identifying patterns of emotional learning, learning sources, perceptions of fairness, and attitudes toward Muslims rather than testing complex causal models.

Qualitative findings were analyzed thematically and integrated with quantitative findings to provide a contextual understanding of the processes underlying attitude formation and emotional learning.

Ethical Considerations

This study was conducted in accordance with established ethical standards for minimal-risk human subjects research. Participation was voluntary, and all participants provided informed consent before participation.

No identifying information was collected, and all responses were recorded anonymously. Data were stored on password-protected devices and secure systems accessible only to the principal investigator. All reporting was conducted in aggregate form to protect participant confidentiality.

Results

Overview

Results are presented as descriptive patterns of reported attitudes, learning experiences, and perceptions regarding Muslims and Muslim experiences among undergraduate students at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor campus. Analyses focused on frequency distributions and patterns of endorsement across domains. Findings reflect participants' self-reported experiences and perceptions and should not be interpreted as evidence of causal relationships.

Reported percentages reflect the proportion of participants endorsing an item, defined as responses of 4 (agree) or 5 (strongly agree) on the 5-point Likert scale.

Learning Sources

Findings

  • 72% of participants reported that their understanding of Muslim experiences was acquired primarily after entering college.
  • Family influences and pre-college experiences were reported less frequently as primary sources of understanding.
  • 68% of participants reported that their understanding of Muslims and Muslim experiences was shaped primarily through classroom instruction, professor-led discussions, and broader university messaging regarding Muslims and themes of diversity, inclusion, social justice, and discrimination, rather than through direct interpersonal relationships with Muslims or lived experiences involving Muslim communities.
  • Participants frequently described educational and campus experiences as the primary context through which they learned about Muslim identity, social experiences, and perceptions of fairness toward Muslims in the United States.

Interpretation

These findings suggest that, for many participants, the university environment served as a primary context for learning about Muslims and Muslim experiences. Participants frequently attributed their understanding to professor-led instruction, classroom discussions, and broader campus messaging encountered after matriculation. Within this sample, attitudes and perceptions regarding Muslims were more commonly associated with educational and campus experiences than with family influences, pre-college socialization, or direct interpersonal experience.

Emotional Learning

Findings

  • Participants frequently reported that emotional experiences played a meaningful role in shaping their understanding of Muslims and Muslim experiences.
  • Personal stories shared by professors, Muslim classmates, and campus speakers were commonly identified as influential learning experiences.
  • Discussions concerning discrimination, fairness, prejudice, minority identity, and social justice were frequently described as emotionally significant.
  • Female participants generally reported greater emotional engagement with these experiences than male participants.

Interpretation

Emotional learning emerged as a recurring feature of participants' descriptions of attitude formation. Many students described learning experiences that were not solely informational but also emotionally salient, suggesting that affective engagement accompanied the development of attitudes and perceptions regarding Muslims. These findings indicate that, within university environments, attitudes may be shaped not only through the transmission of information but also through emotionally meaningful narratives and social experiences.

Perceptions of Fairness Toward Muslims

Findings

  • 84% of female participants endorsed the belief that Muslims experience unfair treatment within the United States, compared with 11% of male participants.
  • Participants who reported stronger emotional engagement with classroom and campus experiences were more likely to endorse perceptions of discrimination and social disadvantage affecting Muslims.
  • Perceptions of unfair treatment frequently co occurred with reports of emotionally meaningful
    educational experiences.

Interpretation

Perceptions of fairness toward Muslims appeared closely associated with emotional learning experiences and campus-based exposure. Participants who described emotionally significant educational experiences were also more likely to endorse beliefs concerning discrimination and social inequality affecting Muslims. These findings suggest that emotional engagement may play an important role in how social fairness is perceived and interpreted within university settings.

Cultural Compatibility

Findings

  • 91% of male participants endorsed perceptions of cultural tension between Islam and Western society, compared with 61% of female participants.
  • Female participants more frequently endorsed statements emphasizing fairness, inclusion, and social understanding.
  • A substantial proportion of participants endorsed both empathic concern toward Muslims and perceptions of cultural tension simultaneously.

Interpretation

The findings suggest that empathy and perceptions of cultural difference are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Many participants expressed concern for Muslims while also acknowledging perceived tensions between Islamic culture and Western society. This pattern indicates that attitudes toward Muslims may involve multiple dimensions of social and moral reasoning operating simultaneously.

Gender Differences

Findings

  • Female participants reported greater emotional engagement and stronger perceptions of unfair treatment toward Muslims.
  • Male participants more frequently endorsed perceptions of cultural tension and cultural difference.
  • Both groups reported learning about Muslims primarily through experiences encountered after entering college.

Interpretation

Gender differences were observed across several domains of emotional learning and attitude formation. Female participants generally reported stronger emotional identification with experiences of discrimination and fairness, whereas male participants more frequently emphasized cultural and societal differences. Despite these differences, participants across genders consistently identified university experiences as a primary source of learning about Muslims and Muslim experiences.

Cross-Domain Patterns

Across domains, findings reflect a consistent pattern:

  • Attitudes toward Muslims were frequently reported as developing after college entry.
  • Professor-led instruction, classroom discussions, and university messaging were commonly identified as influential learning sources.
  • Emotional engagement frequently accompanied learning experiences.
  • Perceptions of fairness and discrimination were associated with emotionally significant educational experiences; and
  • Empathy toward Muslims frequently coexisted with perceptions of cultural tension and cultural difference.

These findings suggest that educational experiences, emotional learning, and broader campus narratives may contribute meaningfully to how students understand Muslims and Muslim experiences during emerging adulthood.

Summary of Findings

Participants frequently reported that their understanding of Muslims and Muslim experiences was acquired primarily after entering college and was influenced by professor-led discussions, classroom instruction, peer interactions, and broader campus messaging. Emotional engagement emerged as a recurring component of these experiences and was associated with perceptions of fairness, empathy, and social understanding.

These findings indicate that university environments may function as important contexts for moral and emotional learning, with educational experiences contributing meaningfully to how students develop attitudes toward Muslims and Muslim experiences.

 

Qualitative Findings

Open-ended responses were analyzed using thematic analysis to examine how participants described the origins of their attitudes toward Muslims and the experiences they viewed as most influential in shaping those attitudes. Four major themes surfaced: (1) emotional learning through educational experiences, (2) professor influence and moral framing, (3) institutional narratives and campus messaging, and (4) limited direct experience with Muslims.

Theme 1: Emotional Learning Through Educational Experiences
Participants frequently described learning experiences that were not solely informational but emotionally significant. Classroom discussions concerning discrimination, minority experiences, and social justice were often described as emotionally impactful and memorable.

Representative quotation:

"No, stats or land history were never discussed by the professor. We really just discuss how marginalized and discriminated against Muslims are in Trump’s America."

Representative quotation:

"Most of my understanding came from classes where we discussed prejudice and discrimination. If you are asking about emotions, those conversations stayed with me emotionally after the course ended. I feel sorry for any Muslim in America right now"

These responses suggest that emotional engagement frequently accompanied educational experiences and may have contributed to how participants formed attitudes regarding Muslims and Muslim experiences.

Theme 2: Professor Influence and Moral Framing

A recurring theme involved the perceived influence of professors in shaping attitudes toward Muslims. Participants frequently identified professor-led discussions as meaningful sources of learning, particularly when topics involving discrimination, prejudice, or minority identity were discussed.

Representative quotation:

"I rarely thought about Muslim experiences before Michigan. My professors encouraged us to think about discrimination or inequality in ways that definitely shape my perspective on this."

Representative quotation:

"Many of the conversations I have in class frame Muslim identity through empathy and social justice. That is how I see this issue."

These responses suggest that professors were viewed by many students as influential sources of both information and moral framing concerning Muslims and Muslim experiences.

Theme 3: Institutional Narratives and Campus Messaging

Participants also described broader university experiences as shaping their understanding of Muslims. Campus events, diversity initiatives, public discussions, and institutional messaging were frequently identified as influential.

Representative quotation:

"The university talked a lot about Muslim identity and how they are discriminated against by white conservatives. Most of what I know about these issues came from those campus conversations."

Representative quotation:

"I learned about this through class discussion. I don’t know any Muslims IRL (in real life)."

These responses suggest that educational and institutional environments may function as important contexts through which students develop social attitudes toward minority groups.

Theme 4: Limited Direct Experience and Reliance on Educational Sources

Perhaps the most striking qualitative finding involved participants' descriptions of limited direct experience with Muslims prior to college. Many participants acknowledged that they had few personal relationships with Muslims and instead relied heavily on educational experiences to form their understanding.

Representative quotation:

"I did not know many Muslims growing up. Most of this I learned here (The University of Michigan). I don’t know any Muslims on campus, but have heard them guest speak a few times"

Representative quotation:

"My opinions were shaped more by stories I heard in class and campus discussions than by people I personally knew."

This pattern is notable because it suggests that, for many participants, attitudes toward Muslims were acquired primarily through educational and emotional experiences encountered after matriculation rather than through longstanding interpersonal relationships or direct lived experience.

Integration with Quantitative Findings

The qualitative findings were consistent with the quantitative results. Participants frequently described learning about Muslims through professor-led instruction, classroom discussion, and university messaging encountered after entering college. Emotional engagement emerged as a recurring feature of these experiences and frequently accompanied perceptions of fairness, empathy, and social understanding.

Taken together, the qualitative findings suggest that attitudes toward Muslims may develop through an interaction of emotional learning, educational experiences, and institutional narratives encountered during emerging adulthood.

Discussion

This study examined how undergraduate students at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor campus developed attitudes toward Muslims and Muslim experiences, with particular attention to the relative influence of educational experiences, emotional learning, and direct interpersonal contact. The findings suggest that, for many participants, attitudes toward Muslims were acquired primarily after entering college and were shaped more strongly by professor-led instruction, classroom discussions, and broader university messaging than by pre-college experiences or direct relationships with Muslims.

The most notable finding of this study may not be what students believed, but rather how they came to believe it. 72% of participants reported that their understanding of Muslim experiences was acquired primarily after entering college, and 68% reported that their understanding was shaped more by educational experiences than by direct interpersonal relationships or lived experience. These findings raise important questions regarding the evolving role of higher education in shaping social attitudes during emerging adulthood.

Traditionally, universities have been understood as institutions devoted primarily to the acquisition of knowledge, critical reasoning, and intellectual autonomy. Increasingly, however, higher education has emphasized emotional learning, social-emotional development, and values-based educational experiences.⁴,⁶,⁷ The findings of this study are consistent with this shift and suggest that emotionally salient educational experiences may, in some contexts, exert a greater influence on attitude formation than factual knowledge acquisition or direct interpersonal experience.

This distinction is psychologically important. Participants did not report learning factual information about Muslims. Rather, they frequently described emotionally meaningful experiences involving narratives of discrimination, fairness, empathy, and social responsibility. Many participants identified these narratives—not objective information or personal experience—as the experiences that most influenced their views. Research on narrative persuasion demonstrates that emotionally engaging stories can shape attitudes and social judgments, particularly when narratives generate emotional identification and moral engagement.⁸,⁹

The qualitative findings reinforce this interpretation. Participants frequently described professor-led discussions and emotionally meaningful classroom experiences as influential in shaping their attitudes. Many reported learning about Muslims through stories of discrimination, minority identity, and social justice rather than through sustained personal relationships with Muslims themselves. This finding is noteworthy because intergroup attitudes have traditionally been understood as developing through interpersonal contact, socialization, and lived interaction.¹⁵

These findings suggest that educational narratives themselves may increasingly function as primary mechanisms through which social attitudes are acquired.

At a broader level, these findings raise important questions concerning what this study proposes as institutional moral learning. In the context of this study, institutional moral learning refers to the process through which educational environments contribute not only to intellectual development but also to the formation of emotionally meaningful moral frameworks through which students interpret social reality. This concept does not imply that moral learning is inherently inappropriate or undesirable within higher education. Rather, it suggests that universities increasingly occupy a role extending beyond the transmission of knowledge to include the shaping of empathic orientations, moral interpretations, and social attitudes.

The findings of this study suggest that when emotional learning becomes a primary pathway through which students acquire attitudes toward social groups, knowledge acquisition may become secondary to emotional identification. This possibility raises important questions for higher education. While emotional engagement may promote empathy and social concern, it may also create circumstances in which emotionally compelling narratives exert greater influence than independent inquiry, competing perspectives, or direct interpersonal experience. Recent scholarship on epistemic cognition and intellectual humility has emphasized the importance of helping students understand how knowledge is formed, revised, and evaluated while cultivating openness to competing viewpoints and intellectual autonomy.¹⁶,¹⁷

The central issue, therefore, may not be whether empathy is being cultivated, but how empathy is being acquired. Historically, empathy has been understood as emerging through interpersonal relationships, lived experience, perspective-taking, and sustained human interaction. In contrast, many participants in this study described developing empathic concern through emotionally salient educational experiences encountered within institutional settings. Contemporary research distinguishes affective empathy from cognitive perspective-taking, suggesting that emotional resonance and reflective understanding are related but distinct psychological processes.¹⁸ This distinction may be important because students may come to feel strongly about a social issue before developing independent knowledge, interpersonal familiarity, or tolerance for competing interpretations.

The present findings therefore raise the possibility that empathy and moral concern, while psychologically valuable, may not always arise from independent understanding or direct interpersonal experience. Rather, for many participants, empathic attitudes appeared to develop through emotionally meaningful educational experiences that preceded firsthand knowledge. Empathy that emerges from independent inquiry and lived experience may differ psychologically from empathy acquired primarily through institutional narratives and emotional identification. Future research should examine whether these distinct pathways to empathy are associated with different outcomes in intellectual autonomy, resilience, identity formation, and psychological well-being.

This question is particularly relevant during emerging adulthood, a developmental period characterized by identity exploration, emotional sensitivity, and the search for meaning. During this stage, young adults are actively constructing frameworks through which they understand themselves, others, and society. If emotionally compelling institutional narratives increasingly become the primary source of moral understanding, educational institutions may assume a developmental role that extends well beyond the communication of knowledge. Such a role carries both opportunities and responsibilities, particularly given the growing concern regarding psychological distress among university students.¹,⁶,¹¹⁻¹³

The broader mental health context strengthens the importance of this issue. Contemporary college students report elevated concerns regarding anxiety, belonging, identity, and meaning.¹³ Recent studies further indicate that campus climate, social belonging, and institutional environments are closely associated with mental health outcomes among college students.¹¹,¹² Although student distress is undoubtedly multifactorial, the findings of this study suggest that researchers should examine more closely how emotionally intensive educational environments influence identity formation, resilience, autonomy, and independent meaning-making during emerging adulthood.

Importantly, this study does not suggest that emotional learning should be excluded from higher education, nor does it imply that empathy and moral concern are undesirable educational outcomes. Rather, the findings raise a more fundamental question: How should universities balance emotional learning with knowledge acquisition, independent reasoning, and intellectual autonomy? Intellectual humility and openness to opposing views are increasingly recognized as important capacities for navigating disagreement and revising one's beliefs.¹⁶,¹⁹ If educational environments cultivate emotional identification without equally cultivating epistemic independence, students may become more morally responsive without necessarily becoming more intellectually autonomous.

The question raised by this study is therefore not whether emotional learning belongs in higher education. Rather, it is whether emotional identification can substitute for independent understanding—and what the psychological consequences may be when it does. If students learn first what to feel, and only later what to know, the relationship between emotional learning, intellectual autonomy, and psychological well-being becomes a matter of developmental importance.

These findings suggest that higher education may increasingly function not only as a setting for intellectual development, but also as a powerful environment for emotional and moral learning. The potential benefit of this shift is the cultivation of empathy and social concern. The potential risk is that emotional identification may precede, and in some cases displace, independent understanding. Understanding this balance represents an important challenge for future research in psychology, higher education, and the study of emerging adulthood.

Conclusion

This study examined how undergraduate students at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor campus developed attitudes toward Muslims and Muslim experiences during emerging adulthood. The findings suggest that, for many participants, these attitudes were acquired primarily after entering college and were shaped more strongly by professor-led instruction, classroom discussions, and broader university messaging than by direct interpersonal experience or pre-college socialization. Emotional learning emerged as a central feature of this process, with many participants describing emotionally meaningful narratives and educational experiences as more influential than the acquisition of factual knowledge alone.

These findings raise broader questions regarding the evolving role of higher education in shaping not only what students know, but how they come to know it. This study proposed the concept of institutional moral learning to describe the process through which educational environments contribute to the development of emotionally meaningful moral frameworks, empathic orientations, and social attitudes. The findings suggest that universities may increasingly function not only as institutions of knowledge, but also as environments in which emotional and moral understanding are actively cultivated during one of the most psychologically formative periods of life.

Importantly, the question raised by this study is not whether empathy, moral concern, or emotional learning belong within higher education. Empathy remains an essential component of human flourishing, and emotional understanding is an important aspect of both education and psychological development. Rather, this study raises a more fundamental question: What are the psychological consequences when emotional identification precedes independent understanding?

For many participants, emotionally compelling educational experiences appeared to exert a greater influence on attitudes toward Muslims than either the acquisition of factual knowledge or direct interpersonal experience. If students learn first what to feel, and only later what to know, the relationship between emotional learning, intellectual autonomy, and psychological well-being becomes a matter of profound importance. The present findings do not resolve this question. Instead, they suggest that it deserves far greater empirical attention than it has thus far received.

As universities continue to shape the intellectual and emotional development of emerging adults, understanding how empathy, knowledge, lived experience, and independent reasoning interact may become one of the defining psychological and educational questions of the twenty-first century. Whether institutions can cultivate empathy while simultaneously preserving intellectual autonomy and independent meaning-making remains an open question—but one with significant implications for higher education, psychological development, and the future well-being of young adults.

References

  1. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
  2. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  4. O’Toole, V., & O’Flaherty, J. (2024). The role of emotion in higher education: Exploring global citizenship education. Irish Educational Studies, 43(4), 645–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2022.2135565
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  6. Bakker, A. B., & Mostert, K. (2024). Study demands–resources theory: Understanding student well-being in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09940-8
  7. Mukhemar, R., Affouneh, S., & Burgos, D. (2025). Technology-enabled social-emotional learning for university educators: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1655634
  8. Igartua, J. J., & Cachón-Ramón, D. (2023). Personal narratives to improve attitudes toward stigmatized immigrants: A parallel-serial mediation model. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 26(1), 96–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211052511
  9. Schmidt, M. L. C., Winkler, J. R., Appel, M., & Richter, T. (2023). Emotional shifts, event-congruent emotions, and transportation in narrative persuasion. Discourse Processes, 60(7), 502–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2023.2252696
  10. Kurdi, B., Krosch, A. R., & Ferguson, M. J. (2023). Oppressed groups engender implicit positivity: Seven demonstrations using novel and familiar targets. Psychological Science, 34(10), 1069–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231194588
  11. McKenzie, C. S., Farmer, A. Y., & Chear, C. (2024). Campus climate and sense of belonging: Implications for the mental health outcomes of Asian American graduate students. Journal of American College Health, 72(9), 3515–3525. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2023.2177819
  12. Peoples, J. E., Butler-Barnes, S. T., Stafford, J. D., Williams, S. L., & Smith, I. (2024). Exploring the association between mental health climate and depression: The protective role of positive mental health and sense of belonging among Black college students. Journal of American College Health, 72(9), 3286–3296. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2022.2155466
  13. Wu, F., Freeman, G., Wang, S., & Flores, I. (2024). The future of college student mental health: Student perspectives. Journal of College Student Mental Health, 38(4), 975–1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/28367138.2024.2400612
  14. Orona, G. A., Pritchard, D., Arum, R., Eccles, J., Dang, Q. V., Copp, D., et al. (2024). Epistemic virtue in higher education: Testing the mechanisms of intellectual character development. Current Psychology, 43, 8102–8116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05005-1
  15. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
  16. Leary, M. R., Diebels, K. J., Davisson, E. K., Jongman-Sereno, K. P., Isherwood, J. C., Raimi, K. T., et al. (2017). Cognitive and interpersonal features of intellectual humility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(6), 793–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217697695
  17. Sandoval, W. A., Greene, J. A., & Bråten, I. (2016). Understanding and promoting thinking about knowledge: Origins, issues, and future directions of research on epistemic cognition. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 457–496. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16669319
  18. Stietz, J., Jauk, E., Krach, S., & Kanske, P. (2019). Dissociating empathy from perspective-taking: Evidence from intra- and inter-individual differences research. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, Article 126. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00126
  19. Porter, T., & Schumann, K. (2018). Intellectual humility and openness to the opposing view. Self and Identity, 17(2), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2017.1361861